|Year||University Policies||University Practices||Student Union Policies||Student Union Practices|
Free expression and academic freedom are not referenced in the Mission, Values or Vision statements of Saint Paul University.
The University does not have any formal policies regulating non-academic student behaviour, nor does it have a policy expressly preventing the University from charging security fees to students hosting discussions or lectures on controversial subjects.
The University’s policy on Prevention of Harassment and Violence defines and prohibits ‘Psychological Harassment’:
Psychological harassment is manifested through repeated hostile or unwanted behaviours, words, actions or acts that violate the dignity or the psychological or physical integrity of a member of the University community and that create, for that person, a harmful work or study environment.
A single serious incident of such behaviour can also be considered psychological harassment if it involves such a violation and results in ongoing harmful effects for a member of the University community.
Among the behaviours that could be considered psychological harassment are:
- comments or actions intended to be contemptuous, condescending, mocking or intimidating;
threats, denigration, humiliation, repeated insinuations, unfounded accusations, exclusion;
extortion, undue pressure;
discriminatory or degrading speech or actions regarding human potential, physical and intellectual abilities.
The Harassment Prevention Committee enforces this policy and facilitates harassment prevention programs of the University. The Committee provides a definition of harassment:
vexatious behaviour manifested through actions, speech, repeated acts or gestures, that are hostile or unwanted, behaviour based or not on discriminatory motives prohibited by the Human Rights Code of Ontario (race, colour, gender, pregnancy, sexual orientation, marital status, age, except within the measures provided by the law, political convictions, language, ethnic or national origin, social circumstance, handicap or use of a means to aid a handicap); and
behaviour detracting from the physical or psychological integrity of a person or in the nature of compromising a right or that is in the nature of compromising work or studies of a person or group of persons or the creation of a work or study climate that is intimidating or hostile.
In March of 2011, Saint Paul’s University invited then-secretary general of Amnesty International, Alex Neve, to give the keynote address at an event to mark the opening of the University’s new Centre for Conflict Studies.
The talk, Resolving and Preventing Conflict: The ‘Rights’ Way, was opposed by some alumni and faculty of Saint Paul’s, due to statements Mr. Neve had made in support of abortion. The University did not officially respond to the complaints, but the event went on as scheduled and without interruption.
Saint Paul’s University Students’ Association (SPUSA) includes in its Goals “[t]o encourage and promote initiatives of an academic, socio-cultural and liturgical nature among its members.”
The SPUSA defers management of non-academic student life, including student organizations and events, to the University and its policies. SPUSA does not take political stances on issues outside of its mandate.
The authors are not aware of cases of the Saint Paul’s University Students’ Association limiting or restricting campus free speech rights, or discriminating against students or clubs on the basis of their opinion.